Insight, awareness, attention - blips and bloops meaning in the MCTB book?

In the MCTB book, the author talks about how they gained their insights by becoming really good at seeing how reality is all chopped up and noting all the blips and bloops, etc. I am trying to make sure I understand this correctly. Is this about how lightly placed attention darts from one thing to another routinely but yet we assume there's something continuous and solid there? That this darting of attention is what is being referred to as the blips of life spliced together to create an experience?

Related and for example: suppose I am a passenger in the car with my hands clasped and I lightly place attention on the mirror. Then I lightly place attention on sound of the car on the road. Then I lightly place attention on the sensation of my two hands touching. I can go to taste and smell also but the first three is enough I find to notice that I'm unable to keep my attention on all three at once. Attention is rapidly darting between the three. It can even make it seem as though I am able to get all three at once but it does seem to be rapid movement of attention that gives this impression.

Now I just go back to concentrating on the mirror. This now seems readily possible and my attention is on the mirror (and/or awareness of it). So when there is one object that is the focus of attention, it does appear far more continuous than if other objects are added. Once I have the mirror concentrated on with attention, then I add the sound and it does really appear as I though I can hear and see at the same time. But I am not sure again if this is just rapid cycling. But once I add three or more objects it becomes clear there's cycling going on. My question here is during the attention on the single object, is there still some sort of cycling going on? For example, between content and awareness of content or is it possible to have a reasonably continuous experience where the cycling has slowed down even if not completely eliminated (I mean at some point one has to take care of their body even if they can concentration for hours or days, no?).

I used different senses since it's easier but it also seems like I can pick two or more objects in the visual field to place attention on and there too attention will start cycling. So is this cycling of attention what the author means the blips of experience or is there something else?

Edit: Here's a few quotes (this is referenced a few times BTW): "A vastly superior form of inquiry and investigation is to carefully examine anything that seems to involve a sense of a split, of a this and a that, particularly at the rate of one to ten times per second or even faster if you can pull it off. Which sensations seem to be the watcher, and which sensations seem to be watched? Try to see the true nature of these sensations one by one as they occur." And here's another quote: "The sensations that imply a mind and mental processes are discontinuous and fleeting. Again, this practice requires steadiness and determination, as well as precision. There is no time to be lost in the content of the thoughts, as I am trying too hard to be clear about the beginning and ending of each little flicker, squawk, and pulse that makes up a thought." There are other times when this seems to refer to all experience (not just mental). For example: "How fast are things vibrating? How many sensations arise and vanish each second? This is exactly what you are trying to experience, but some very general guidelines can provide faith that it can be done and perhaps point the way as well. Begin by assuming we are initially talking about one to ten times per second. This is not actually that fast. Try tapping five to ten times per second on a table or something. It might take two hands, but it’s doable, isn’t it? You could experience that, couldn’t you? That’s the spirit!"